Chapter 48.
JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH
BY
H. C. G. MOULE,
Bishop Of
"Justification
by Faith"; the phrase is weighty alike with Scripture and with history.
In Holy Scripture it is the main theme of two great dogmatic epistles,
Romans and Galatians. In Christian history it was the potent watchword
of the Reformation movement in its aspect as a vast spiritual upheaval
of the church. It is not by any means the only great truth considered
in the two epistles; we should woefully misread them if we allowed
their message about Justification by Faith to obscure their message about
the Holy Ghost, and the strong relation between the two messages.
It
was not the only great truth which moved and animated the spiritual leaders
of the Reformation. Nevertheless, such is the depth and dignity of this
truth, and so central in some respects is its reference to other truths of our
salvation, that we may fairly say that it was the message of St. Paul, and
the truth that lay at the heart of the distinctive messages of the non- Pauline
epistles too, and that it was the truth of the great Reformation of the
Western church.
With
reason, seeing things as he was led in a profound experience to see them,
did Luther say that Justification by Faith was "the articles of a standing
or a falling church." With reason does an illustrious representative of
the older school of "higher" Anglicanism, a name to me ever bright
and venerable,
Edward Harold Browne, say that Justification by Faith is not only
this, but also "the article of a standing or a falling soul."
IMPORT
OF THE TERMS
Let
us apply ourselves first to a study of the meaning of our terms. Here are
two great terms before us, Justification and Faith. We shall, of course, consider
in its place the word which, in our title, links them, and ask how Justification
is "by" Faith. But first, what is Justification, and then, what is Faith?
By
derivation, no doubt, JUSTIFICATION means to make just, that is to say, to
make conformable to a true standard. It would seem thus to mean a process
by which wrong is corrected, and bad is made good, and good better,
in the way of actual improvement of the thing or person justified. In one
curious case, and, so far as I know, in that case only, the word has this meaning
in actual use. "Justification" is a term of the printer’s
art. The compositor
"justifies" a piece of typework when he corrects, brings into perfect
order, as to spaces between words and letters, and so on, the types which
he has set up.
But
this, as I have said, is a solitary case. In the use of words otherwise, universally,
Justification and Justify mean something quite different from improvement
of condition. They mean establishment of position as before a judge
or jury, literal or figurative. They mean the winning of a favorable verdict
in such a presence, or again (what is the same thing from another side)
the utterance of that verdict, the sentence of acquittal, or the sentence of
vindicated fight, as the case may be.
I
am thinking of the word not at all exclusively as a religious word. Take it in
its common, everyday employment; it is always thus. To justify an opinion,
to justify a course of conduct, to justify a statement, to justify a friend,
what does it mean? Not to readjust and improve your thoughts; or your
actions, or your words; not to educate your friend to be wiser or more
able. No, but to win a verdict for thought, or action, or word, or friend,
at some bar of judgment, as for example the bar of public opinion, or
of common conscience. It is not to improve, but to vindicate.
Take
a ready illustration to the same effect from Scripture, and from a passage
not of doctrine, but of public Israelite law: "If there be a
controversy between men, and they come unto judgment, that the judges may judge them,
then they shall justify the righteous and condemn the wicked"
(Deuteronomy 25:1).
Here
it is obvious that the question is not one of moral improvement. The judges
are not to make the righteous man better. They are to vindicate his position
as satisfactory to the law. Non-theological passages, it may be observed,
and generally non theological connections, are of the greatest use in
determining the true, native meaning of theological terms. For with
rare exceptions, which are for the most part matters of open history, as in
the case of the Homousion, theological terms are terms of common thought,
adapted to a special use, but in themselves unchanged. That is, they were
thus used at first, in the simplicity of original truth. Later ages may
have deflected that simplicity. It was so as a fact with our word
Justification, as we shall see immediately.
But
at first the word meant in religion precisely what it meant out of it. It meant
the winning, or the consequent announcement, of a favorable verdict.
Not the word, but the application was altered when salvation was in
question. It was indeed a new and glorious application. The verdict in question
was the verdict not of a Hebrew court, nor of public opinion, but of
the eternal Judge of all the earth. But that left the meaning of the word the
same.
JUSTIFICATION
A "FORENSIC" TERM
It
is thus evident that the word Justification, alike in religious and in common
parlance, is a word connected with law. It has to do with acquittal,
vindication, acceptance before a judgment seat. To use a technical
term, it is a forensic word, a word of the law-courts (which in old
Not
that it has nothing to do with our inward spiritual purification. It has intense
and vital relations that way. But they are not direct relations. The direct
concern of Justification is with man’s
need of a divine deliverance, not from the power of his sin, but from its
guilt.
MISTAKEN
INTERPRETATIONS
Here
we must note accordingly two remarkable instances of misuse of the word
Justification in the history of Christian thought. The first is found in the
theology of the School-men, the great thinkers of the Middle Ages in Western
Christendom — Peter Lombard, Thomas
Aquinas, and others. (See T. B. Mozley, "Baptismal
Controversy," Chap. VII.) To them Justification appears to have meant much
the same as regeneration, the great internal change in the state of our nature
wrought by grace. The other instance appears in the sixteenth century,
in the Decrees of the Council of Trent, a highly authoritative
statement of Romanist belief and teaching. There Justification is
described (vi. c. 7) as "not the mere remission of sins but also the
sanctification and renovation of the inner man." In this remarkable sentence
the Romanist theologians seem to combine the true account of the word,
though imperfectly stated, with the view of the Schoolmen. It is not too much
to say that a careful review of the facts summarized above, as regards the
secular use of the word Justification, and the Scriptural use of it in
the doctrine of salvation, is enough to negative these explanations. They are
curious and memorable examples of misinterpretation of terms; that
most fruitful source Of further, wider and deeper error.
JUSTIFICATION
NOT THE SAME AS PARDON
The
problem raised then, in religion, by the word Justification, is, How shall
man be just before God? To use the words of our Eleventh Article, it is,
How shall we be "accounted righteous before God?" In other words, How
shall we, having sinned, having broken the holy Law, having violated the
will of God, be treated, as to our acceptance before Him, as to our "peace
with Him" (Romans 5:1), as if we had not done so? Its question is
not, directly, How shall I a sinner become holy, but, How shall I a sinner be
received by my God, whom I have grieved, as if I had not grieved Him?
Here
let us note, what will be clear on reflection, that Justification means properly
no less than this, the being received by Him as if we had not grieved
Him. It is not only, the being forgiven by Him. We do indeed as sinners
most urgently need forgiveness, the remission of our sins, the putting
away of the holy vengeance of God upon our rebellion. But we need
more. We need the voice which says, not merely, you may go; you are
let off your penalty; but, you may come; you are welcomed into My presence
and fellowship. We shall see later how important this difference is in
the practical problems of our full salvation. But one thing is evident at first
sight, namely, that this is implied in the very word Justification. For Justification,
in common speech, never means pardon. It means winning, or granting,
a position of acceptance. "You are justified in taking this course of
action," does not mean, you were wrong, yet you are forgiven. It means, you
were right, and in the court of my opinion you have proved it. In religion
accordingly our Justification means not merely a grant of pardon, but
a verdict in favor of Our standing as satisfactory before the Judge.
THE
SPECIAL PROBLEM OF OUR JUSTIFICATION
Here
in passing let us notice that of course the word Justification does not of
itself imply that the justified person is a sinner. To see this as plainly as possible,
recollect that God Himself is said to be justified, in Psalm 51:4,
and Christ Himself, in 1 Timothy 3:16. In a human court of law, as
we have seen above, it is the supreme duty of the judge to "justify the righteous"
(Deuteronomy 25:1), and the righteous only. In all such cases
Justification bears its perfectly proper meaning, unperplexed, crossed by
no mystery or problem. But then, the moment we come to the concrete, practical
question, how shall we be justified, and before God, or, to bring it closer
home, how shall I, I the sinner, be welcomed by my offended Lord as
if I were satisfactory, then the thought of Justification presents itself to us
in a new and most solemn aspect. The word keeps its meaning unshaken.
But how about its application. Here am I, guilty. To be justified is
to be pronounced not guilty, to be vindicated and accepted by Lawgiver and
Law. Is it possible? Is it not impossible?
Justification by Faith, in the actual case of our salvation, is thus a "short phrase." It means, in full, the acceptance of guilty sinners, before God, by Faith. Great is the problem so indicated. And great is the wonder and the glory of the solution given us by the grace of God. But to this solution we must advance by some further steps.
Continuation: http://thatblessedhope.ucoz.com/index/0-53